Experiment 4 min read
Impressions Up, Clicks Down? Three SEO Reports Worth Reading Carefully
Three practitioners describe a widening impression-to-click gap. Their reports also show why falling CTR is not proof of AI-caused traffic loss.
Experiment 4 min read
Three practitioners describe a widening impression-to-click gap. Their reports also show why falling CTR is not proof of AI-caused traffic loss.
Experiment 4 min read
People tracking AI answers report changing sources and unstable opportunity labels. Repeated, consistent sampling makes visibility claims more useful.
Experiment 4 min read
Reports involving Reddit answers, LinkedIn posts and local business mentions show why a site-only visibility check can miss part of the picture.
Experiment 4 min read
Three reports show stronger AI-referral conversion, while a fourth finds the reverse. Intent, sample size and conversion definitions explain why comparisons need care.
Experiment 4 min read
Four practitioner reports distinguish file access, page discovery and AI citations. A positive example also explains why causation remains uncertain.
Article 13 min read
Create an AI search baseline that separates eligibility, generative-feature impressions, visits, and business outcomes—and avoids false attribution.
Article 12 min read
Implement accurate structured data for supported search features without treating schema markup as a guaranteed AI citation or ranking switch.
Article 13 min read
Build an evidence-based AI search optimization program with crawlable pages, original information, clear answers, strong internal links, and measurable outcomes.
Article 11 min read
Understand the practical difference between generative engine optimization and SEO without treating a new label as a replacement for search fundamentals.