The latest perspective
How to Check an AI Draft Before Publishing
Check an AI draft for evidence, useful instructions and hidden assumptions with a practical review sequence and a release checklist.
Read the storySEO intelligence. Human perspective.
Make sense of search in the age of AI. Practical guides, thoughtful experiments, and useful tools for your next move.
The latest perspective
Check an AI draft for evidence, useful instructions and hidden assumptions with a practical review sequence and a release checklist.
Read the storyArticle 6 min read
Check an AI draft for evidence, useful instructions and hidden assumptions with a practical review sequence and a release checklist.
Article 13 min read
Create an AI search baseline that separates eligibility, generative-feature impressions, visits, and business outcomes—and avoids false attribution.
Article 10 min read
Use AI to draft page-specific meta descriptions, then verify accuracy, uniqueness, intent match, and rendered metadata before release.
Turn insight into action
A little learning. A better workflow. Something worth trying.
Learn the principles behind discoverable, useful websites.
Explore learning paths 02Start with a purposeful prompt. Adapt it to your own process.
Browse the prompt library 03Find focused tools that help you move from idea to execution.
Discover toolsLearning Path 110 min read
Use supplied crawl evidence to triage SEO issues, propose useful internal links, and create a verified fix plan through five text lessons.
Learning Path 100 min read
Build an evidence-led SEO content brief, draft with AI, check claims, prepare metadata, and plan meaningful updates in five practical lessons.
Experiment 4 min read
Three practitioners describe a widening impression-to-click gap. Their reports also show why falling CTR is not proof of AI-caused traffic loss.
Experiment 4 min read
People tracking AI answers report changing sources and unstable opportunity labels. Repeated, consistent sampling makes visibility claims more useful.
Evidence before hype
We value clear methods, useful sources, and honest limitations.